Dear internet,
Seth Brigham (aka capt. Underpants) officially announced today that he has retained the legal service of famous civil rights attorney David Lane. Lane comes with the full backing of the ACLU and other lawyers not only in his firm but other firms in Boulder and Denver. Lane has carefully gone over the violations by the Boulder City council of Seths free speech rights. When David Lane comes knocking on the cities door this is serious business and Lane will take it all of the way to the US Supreme court if necessary.
The Boulder council has had this coming for a long time. They have repeatedly violated citizens civil rights over the past decade. This all started back in in 2003 when they attempted to control free speech on public access tv. This is the dirty work of former mayor Mark Ruzzin come home to roost. This is retribution for the evil doings of former council members Robin Bohannan, Andy Schuthies, Jack Stoakes, Richard Polk and the notorious mayor Shawn Mcgrath. This is pay back for the scandalous Tony Perri and his cabal The Beeck sisters (BIFF), and attorney Barry Satlow who all repeatedly violated Seth's right to free speech. It has been the most notorious time in Boulder's history.
A Lane led lawsuit not only answers the council many attempts to shut Seth up, it answers the council attempt to shut up all citizens on public access TV. The current dastardly council members with works of suppression are the terrible Suzy Ageston, Ken Wilson, Macon Cowles, George K. and Mayor Susan Osborne.
A winning lawsuit by David Lane will provide the hundreds of thousand of dollars we need to further fight the city in future first amendment battles.
This council will have to be made to pay and suffer before they ever get the message. They will be forced to turn public access channel 54 back on and they will have to write a formal letter of apology to Seth. Six council members must resign over this. The punishment needs to be swift and harsh.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Read this recent explanation from Wiki
The First Amendment to the United States Constitution is part of the Bill of Rights. The amendment prohibits the making of any law "respecting an establishment of religion", impeding the free exercise of religion, infringing on the freedom of speech, infringing on the freedom of the press, interfering with the right to peaceably assemble or prohibiting the petitioning for a governmental redress of grievances.
Originally, the First Amendment only applied to the Congress. However, in the 20th century, the Supreme Court held that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment applies the First Amendment to each state, including any local government.
Jann Scott
Boulder Colorado
316 days left
1 comment:
I'm going all the way to the Supreme Court?
Wow!
Can I address them in my undies?
Post a Comment